Radeon R9 255 OEM vs ATI IGP 320M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1591not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameRS100Cape Verde
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date5 October 2002 (23 years ago)21 December 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2512
Core clock speed160 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed160 MHz930 MHz
Number of transistors30 million1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data65 Watt
Texture fill rate0.1629.76
Floating-point processing powerno data0.9523 TFLOPS
ROPs116
TMUs132
L1 Cacheno data128 KB
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1150 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data73.6 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGL1.44.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 October 2002 21 December 2013
Chip lithography 180 nm 28 nm

R9 255 OEM has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 543% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon IGP 320M and Radeon R9 255 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon IGP 320M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon R9 255 OEM is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 17 votes

Rate Radeon IGP 320M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1069 votes

Rate Radeon R9 255 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon IGP 320M or Radeon R9 255 OEM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.