ATI Graphics Ultra + vs ATI Radeon IGP 320M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1517not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)no data
GPU code nameRS100Mach32
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date5 October 2002 (22 years ago)1 January 1992 (32 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2no data
Core clock speed160 MHz10 MHz
Boost clock speed160 MHzno data
Number of transistors30 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology180 nm800 nm
Texture fill rate0.16no data
ROPs11
TMUs1no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCI
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDRAM
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared1 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared10 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data80.0 MB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.0None
OpenGL1.4None
OpenCLN/ANone
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 October 2002 1 January 1992
Chip lithography 180 nm 800 nm

ATI IGP 320M has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 344.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon IGP 320M and Graphics Ultra +. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon IGP 320M is a notebook card while Graphics Ultra + is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon IGP 320M
Radeon IGP 320M
ATI Graphics Ultra +
Graphics Ultra +

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 17 votes

Rate Radeon IGP 320M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Graphics Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.