ATI FireMV 2260 vs ATI Radeon IGP 320M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1585not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameRS100RV620
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date5 October 2002 (23 years ago)2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores240
Core clock speed160 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speed160 MHzno data
Number of transistors30 million181 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rate0.162.000
ROPs14
TMUs14

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR2
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared256 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1000 MBps
Memory bandwidthno data8 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.010.1 (10_1)
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGL1.43.3
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 180 nm 55 nm

ATI FireMV 2260 has a 227.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon IGP 320M and FireMV 2260. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon IGP 320M is a notebook graphics card while FireMV 2260 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon IGP 320M
Radeon IGP 320M
ATI FireMV 2260
FireMV 2260

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 17 votes

Rate Radeon IGP 320M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FireMV 2260 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon IGP 320M or FireMV 2260, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.