Radeon Graphics 320SP vs HD 8970M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking506not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.11no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameNeptuneRenoir
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date14 May 2013 (12 years ago)6 January 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280320
Core clock speed850 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHz1400 MHz
Number of transistors2,800 million9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate72.0028.00
Floating-point processing power2.304 TFLOPS0.896 TFLOPS
ROPs328
TMUs8020
L1 Cache320 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1200 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth153.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.7 (6.4)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 May 2013 6 January 2020
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 15 Watt

Graphics 320SP has an age advantage of 6 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 566.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8970M and Radeon Graphics 320SP. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8970M
Radeon HD 8970M
AMD Radeon Graphics 320SP
Radeon Graphics 320SP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 46 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8970M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 7 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 320SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8970M or Radeon Graphics 320SP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.