ATI WinBoost vs Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking358not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.63no data
ArchitectureGCN (2012−2015)Mach (1992−1997)
GPU code nameNeptune CFMach64
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 May 2012 (14 years ago)1 November 1995 (30 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$229

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560no data
Core clock speed850 MHz40 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data1 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm600 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Wattno data
ROPsno data1

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCI
Widthno data1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5EDO
Maximum RAM amountno data2 MB
Memory bus width2x 256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed4800 MHz40 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data320.0 MB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1N/A
OpenGLno dataN/A
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 May 2012 1 November 1995
Chip lithography 28 nm 600 nm

HD 8970M Crossfire has an age advantage of 16 years, and a 2043% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire and WinBoost. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire is a notebook graphics card while WinBoost is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 4 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate WinBoost on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire or WinBoost, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.