Radeon HD 7560G IGP vs HD 8970M Crossfire

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking352not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.56no data
ArchitectureGCN (2012−2015)TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)
GPU code nameNeptune CFDevastator Lite
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 May 2012 (13 years ago)15 May 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560256
Core clock speed850 MHz496 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHz760 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,303 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rateno data12.16
Floating-point processing powerno data0.3891 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus width2x 256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed4800 MHzSystem Shared
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.111.2 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.0
OpenGLno data4.4
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 28 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 35 Watt

HD 8970M Crossfire has a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

HD 7560G IGP, on the other hand, has 471.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire and Radeon HD 7560G IGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
AMD Radeon HD 7560G IGP
Radeon HD 7560G IGP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 4 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7560G IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire or Radeon HD 7560G IGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.