ATI Radeon 9200 LE vs HD 8970M Crossfire

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking3531603
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.56no data
ArchitectureGCN (2012−2015)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameNeptune CFRV280
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 May 2012 (13 years ago)1 May 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560no data
Core clock speed850 MHz250 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data36 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rateno data1.000
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amountno data64 MB
Memory bus width2x 256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed4800 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data6.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.18.1
OpenGLno data1.4
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD69no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 95−100 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40 no data
Resident Evil 4 Remake 35−40 no data

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 70−75 no data
Counter-Strike 2 95−100 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40 no data
Far Cry 5 55−60 no data
Fortnite 90−95 no data
Forza Horizon 4 70−75 no data
Forza Horizon 5 50−55 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70 no data
Valorant 130−140 no data

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 70−75 no data
Counter-Strike 2 95−100 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 128 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40 no data
Dota 2 100−110 no data
Far Cry 5 55−60 no data
Fortnite 90−95 no data
Forza Horizon 4 70−75 no data
Forza Horizon 5 50−55 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70 no data
Metro Exodus 35−40 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50 no data
Valorant 130−140 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 70−75 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40 no data
Dota 2 100−110 no data
Far Cry 5 55−60 no data
Forza Horizon 4 70−75 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50 no data
Valorant 130−140 no data

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 90−95 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 30−35 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30 no data
Metro Exodus 21−24 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170 no data
Valorant 160−170 no data

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 45−50 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 no data
Far Cry 5 35−40 no data
Forza Horizon 4 40−45 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 40−45 no data

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 14−16 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35 no data
Metro Exodus 14−16 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27 no data
Valorant 95−100 no data

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 24−27 no data
Counter-Strike 2 14−16 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8 no data
Dota 2 60−65 no data
Far Cry 5 18−20 no data
Forza Horizon 4 30−33 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 18−20 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 May 2012 1 May 2003
Chip lithography 28 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 28 Watt

HD 8970M Crossfire has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 436% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9200 LE, on the other hand, has 614% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire and Radeon 9200 LE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 9200 LE is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 4 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4 votes

Rate Radeon 9200 LE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire or Radeon 9200 LE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.