Quadro RTX 5000 vs Radeon HD 8830M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated143
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data5.08
Power efficiencyno data12.33
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameVenusTU104
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 April 2013 (12 years ago)13 August 2018 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6403072
Core clock speed575 MHz1620 MHz
Boost clock speed625 MHz1815 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data230 Watt
Texture fill rate25.00348.5
Floating-point processing power0.8 TFLOPS11.15 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs40192
Tensor Coresno data384
Ray Tracing Coresno data48
L1 Cache160 KB3 MB
L2 Cache256 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth32 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2013 13 August 2018
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm

RTX 5000 has an age advantage of 5 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8830M and Quadro RTX 5000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8830M is a notebook graphics card while Quadro RTX 5000 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8830M
Radeon HD 8830M
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
Quadro RTX 5000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 10 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8830M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 241 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8830M or Quadro RTX 5000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.