Radeon RX Vega M vs HD 8750A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated377
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data80.44
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameMarsVega
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date2 February 2013 (13 years ago)1 February 2018 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384512
Core clock speed600 MHz720 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1190 MHz
Number of transistors950 million4,500 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate14.4038.08
Floating-point processing power0.4608 TFLOPSno data
ROPs88
TMUs2432
L1 Cache96 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)IGP
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth16 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12.0
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.131-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 February 2013 1 February 2018
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 15 Watt

RX Vega M has an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8750A and Radeon RX Vega M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8750A is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX Vega M is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 3 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8750A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.7 9 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8750A or Radeon RX Vega M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.