Radeon R5 M330 vs HD 8750A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1033
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data6.06
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameMarsExo
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date2 February 2013 (12 years ago)5 May 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384320
Compute unitsno data5
Core clock speed600 MHz955 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1030 MHz
Number of transistors950 million690 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate14.4020.60
Floating-point processing power0.4608 TFLOPS0.6592 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs2420
L1 Cache96 KB80 KB
L2 Cache128 KB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth16 GB/s14.4 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

HD3D-+
PowerTune-+
DualGraphics-+
ZeroCore-+
Switchable graphics-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)DirectX® 12
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.2Not Listed
Vulkan1.2.131+
Mantle-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 February 2013 5 May 2015
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 18 Watt

R5 M330 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 150% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8750A and Radeon R5 M330. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8750A
Radeon HD 8750A
AMD Radeon R5 M330
Radeon R5 M330

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 3 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8750A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 1185 votes

Rate Radeon R5 M330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8750A or Radeon R5 M330, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.