Radeon Pro VII vs HD 8750A
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 194 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 6.46 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 9.49 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) | GCN 5.1 (2018−2022) |
| GPU code name | Mars | Vega 20 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 2 February 2013 (12 years ago) | 13 May 2020 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $1,899 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 384 | 3840 |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 1400 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1700 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 950 million | 13,230 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 14.40 | 408.0 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.4608 TFLOPS | 13.06 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 64 |
| TMUs | 24 | 240 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 305 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR3 | HBM2 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 4096 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 16 GB/s | 1024 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.7 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.3 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 2 February 2013 | 13 May 2020 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 16 GB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 250 Watt |
HD 8750A has 455.6% lower power consumption.
Pro VII, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8750A and Radeon Pro VII. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon HD 8750A is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro VII is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
