HD Graphics 520 vs Radeon HD 8750A

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated857
Place by popularitynot in top-10043
Power efficiencyno data9.93
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Generation 9.0 (2015−2016)
GPU code nameMarsSkylake GT2
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date2 February 2013 (11 years ago)1 September 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384192
Core clock speed600 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data900 MHz
Number of transistors950 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm+
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate14.4021.60
Floating-point processing power0.4608 TFLOPS0.3456 TFLOPS
ROPs83
TMUs2424

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)Ring Bus
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount1 GB32 GB
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth16 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.131+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 February 2013 1 September 2015
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 15 Watt

HD Graphics 520 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8750A and HD Graphics 520. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8750A is a notebook card while HD Graphics 520 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8750A
Radeon HD 8750A
Intel HD Graphics 520
HD Graphics 520

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 3 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8750A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2972 votes

Rate HD Graphics 520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.