HD Graphics 4200 vs Radeon HD 8750A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1185
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data17.52
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Generation 7.5 (2013)
GPU code nameMarsHaswell GT2
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date2 February 2013 (13 years ago)2 September 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384160
Core clock speed600 MHz200 MHz
Boost clock speedno data850 MHz
Number of transistors950 million392 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt4 Watt
Texture fill rate14.4017.00
Floating-point processing power0.4608 TFLOPS0.272 TFLOPS
ROPs82
TMUs2420
L1 Cache96 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)Ring Bus

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth16 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.3
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.131+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 February 2013 2 September 2013
Chip lithography 28 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 4 Watt

HD Graphics 4200 has an age advantage of 7 months, a 27% more advanced lithography process, and 1025% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8750A and HD Graphics 4200. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 3 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8750A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 42 votes

Rate HD Graphics 4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8750A or HD Graphics 4200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.