FirePro 2270 1GB Edition vs Radeon HD 8750A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameMarsCedar
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date2 February 2013 (12 years ago)31 January 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38480
Core clock speed600 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors950 million292 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt17 Watt
Texture fill rate14.404.80
Floating-point processing power0.4608 TFLOPSno data
ROPs84
TMUs248
L1 Cache96 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data170 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1200 MHz
Memory bandwidth16 GB/s9.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)11.0
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.131-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 February 2013 31 January 2011
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 17 Watt

HD 8750A has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

2270 1GB Edition, on the other hand, has 164.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8750A and FirePro 2270 1GB Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8750A is a notebook graphics card while FirePro 2270 1GB Edition is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8750A
Radeon HD 8750A
AMD FirePro 2270 1GB Edition
FirePro 2270 1GB Edition

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 3 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8750A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.2 319 votes

Rate FirePro 2270 1GB Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8750A or FirePro 2270 1GB Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.