Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition vs Radeon HD 8740 OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameCape VerdeG84
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date5 September 2013 (11 years ago)27 September 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$109 $699

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51232
Core clock speed800 MHz520 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 million289 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt42 Watt
Texture fill rate25.608.320
Floating-point processing power0.8192 TFLOPS0.06656 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs3216

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length168 mm168 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1125 MHz650 MHz
Memory bandwidth72 GB/s20.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort2x DVI, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 September 2013 27 September 2008
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 42 Watt

HD 8740 OEM has an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

FX 1700 Mac Edition, on the other hand, has 31% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8740 OEM and Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8740 OEM is a desktop graphics card while Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8740 OEM
Radeon HD 8740 OEM
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Radeon HD 8740 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.5 2 votes

Rate Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8740 OEM or Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.