Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 vs HD 8670D

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1084not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.95no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameDevastatorTahiti
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date12 March 2013 (12 years ago)31 January 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384768
Core clock speed844 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed950 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,303 million4,313 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt85 Watt
Texture fill rate22.8038.40
Floating-point processing power0.7296 TFLOPS1.229 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs2448
L1 Cacheno data192 KB
L2 Cacheno data768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared3 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared384 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data240.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 March 2013 31 January 2012
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 85 Watt

HD 8670D has an age advantage of 1 year.

HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2, on the other hand, has a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 17.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8670D and Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8670D
Radeon HD 8670D
AMD Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2
Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 73 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8670D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8670D or Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.