Quadro K5000 Mac Edition vs Radeon HD 8670D

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1082not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.95no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameDevastatorGK104
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date12 March 2013 (12 years ago)7 August 2012 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,249

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3841536
Core clock speed844 MHz706 MHz
Boost clock speed950 MHz706 MHz
Number of transistors1,303 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt122 Watt
Texture fill rate22.8090.37
Floating-point processing power0.7296 TFLOPS2.169 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs24128
L1 Cacheno data128 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1350 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data172.8 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort 1.2

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.06.5 (5.1)
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/A1.2.175
CUDA-3.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 March 2013 7 August 2012
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 122 Watt

HD 8670D has an age advantage of 7 months, and 22% lower power consumption.

K5000 Mac Edition, on the other hand, has a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8670D and Quadro K5000 Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8670D is a desktop graphics card while Quadro K5000 Mac Edition is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8670D
Radeon HD 8670D
NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition
Quadro K5000 Mac Edition

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 73 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8670D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 3 votes

Rate Quadro K5000 Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8670D or Quadro K5000 Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.