ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4270 IGP vs HD 8670D

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1093not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.95no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameDevastatorRS880
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date12 March 2013 (13 years ago)1 May 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38440
Core clock speed844 MHz590 MHz
Boost clock speed950 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,303 million181 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Wattno data
Texture fill rate22.802.360
Floating-point processing power0.7296 TFLOPS0.0472 TFLOPS
ROPs84
TMUs244

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 1.0 x16
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.04.1
OpenGL4.43.3
OpenCL1.21.0
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 March 2013 1 May 2010
Chip lithography 32 nm 55 nm

HD 8670D has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 72% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8670D and Mobility Radeon HD 4270 IGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8670D is a desktop graphics card while Mobility Radeon HD 4270 IGP is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 76 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8670D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 4270 IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8670D or Mobility Radeon HD 4270 IGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.