A40 PCIe vs Radeon HD 8670D

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1057not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.97no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameDevastatorGA102
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date12 March 2013 (12 years ago)5 October 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38410752
Core clock speed844 MHz1305 MHz
Boost clock speed950 MHz1755 MHz
Number of transistors1,303 million28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate22.80589.7
Floating-point processing power0.7296 TFLOPS37.74 TFLOPS
ROPs8112
TMUs24336
Tensor Coresno data336
Ray Tracing Coresno data84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared48 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared384 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1812 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data695.8 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs3x DisplayPort

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.5
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 March 2013 5 October 2020
Chip lithography 32 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 300 Watt

HD 8670D has 200% lower power consumption.

A40 PCIe, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8670D and A40 PCIe. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8670D is a desktop graphics card while A40 PCIe is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8670D
Radeon HD 8670D
NVIDIA A40 PCIe
A40 PCIe

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 73 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8670D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 89 votes

Rate A40 PCIe on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8670D or A40 PCIe, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.