RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs Radeon HD 8670A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated48
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data34.01
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameSunAD104
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date2 February 2013 (12 years ago)9 August 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3206144
Core clock speed600 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2175 MHz
Number of transistors690 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt130 Watt
Texture fill rate12.00417.6
Floating-point processing power0.384 TFLOPS26.73 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs20192
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48
L1 Cache80 KB6 MB
L2 Cache128 KB48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data245 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB20 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit160 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth16 GB/s360.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)6.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.1 (1.2)3.0
Vulkan1.2.1701.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 February 2013 9 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 20 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 130 Watt

HD 8670A has 188.9% lower power consumption.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, a 1900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8670A and RTX 4000 Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8670A is a notebook graphics card while RTX 4000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8670A
Radeon HD 8670A
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation
RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 7 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8670A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 65 votes

Rate RTX 4000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8670A or RTX 4000 Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.