RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile vs Radeon HD 8670A

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated138
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data23.59
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameSunno data
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date2 February 2013 (12 years ago)21 March 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3203072
Core clock speed600 MHzno data
Number of transistors690 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt115 Watt (35 - 115 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate12.00no data
Floating-point processing power0.384 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8no data
TMUs20no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth16 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 February 2013 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 115 Watt

HD 8670A has 155.6% lower power consumption.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8670A and RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8670A is a notebook graphics card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8670A
Radeon HD 8670A
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 2000 Ada Generation

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 6 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8670A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 32 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8670A or RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.