Quadro T2000 Mobile vs Radeon HD 8670A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated314
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data24.24
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameSunTU117
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date2 February 2013 (12 years ago)27 May 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3201024
Core clock speed600 MHz1575 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1785 MHz
Number of transistors690 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate12.00114.2
Floating-point processing power0.384 TFLOPS3.656 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs2064
L1 Cache80 KB1 MB
L2 Cache128 KB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth16 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)6.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.1 (1.2)1.2
Vulkan1.2.1701.2.131
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 February 2013 27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 60 Watt

HD 8670A has 33.3% lower power consumption.

T2000 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8670A and Quadro T2000 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8670A is a notebook graphics card while Quadro T2000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8670A
Radeon HD 8670A
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
Quadro T2000 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 7 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8670A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 475 votes

Rate Quadro T2000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8670A or Quadro T2000 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.