Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150 vs Radeon HD 8650M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking949not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN (2012−2015)Gen. 4 (2007−2010)
GPU code nameno dataPineview
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date7 January 2013 (12 years ago)10 January 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3842
Core clock speed650 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data200 MHz
Number of transistors900 Million123 Million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm45 nm

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount2 GBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed4500 MHzno data
Shared memory-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 January 2013 10 January 2010
Chip lithography 28 nm 45 nm

HD 8650M has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 60.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8650M and Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8650M
Radeon HD 8650M
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 12 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8650M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 353 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8650M or Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.