ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition vs HD 8650G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1098not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.61no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameDevastatorRV630
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date23 May 2013 (12 years ago)21 February 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384120
Core clock speed533 MHz700 MHz
Boost clock speed720 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,303 million390 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate17.285.600
Floating-point processing power0.553 TFLOPS0.168 TFLOPS
ROPs84
TMUs248
L2 Cacheno data64 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceIGPPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared256 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared800 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)10.0 (10_0)
Shader Model5.04.0
OpenGL4.43.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 May 2013 21 February 2008
Chip lithography 32 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 45 Watt

HD 8650G has an age advantage of 5 years, a 103.1% more advanced lithography process, and 28.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8650G and Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8650G is a notebook graphics card while Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8650G
Radeon HD 8650G
ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 100 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8650G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8650G or Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.