GeForce GTX 260 216 vs Radeon HD 8650G
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1093 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 2.62 | no data |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 (2010−2013) | Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013) |
| GPU code name | Devastator | GT200 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 23 May 2013 (12 years ago) | 16 September 2008 (17 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $299 |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 384 | 216 |
| Core clock speed | 533 MHz | 576 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 720 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,303 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 182 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 17.28 | 41.47 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.553 TFLOPS | 0.5365 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 28 |
| TMUs | 24 | 72 |
| L2 Cache | no data | 224 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 267 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 2x 6-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 896 MB |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | 448 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | 999 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 111.9 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | - | 1.3 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 23 May 2013 | 16 September 2008 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 182 Watt |
HD 8650G has an age advantage of 4 years, a 103.1% more advanced lithography process, and 420% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8650G and GeForce GTX 260 Core 216. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon HD 8650G is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
