Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs Radeon HD 8650G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1101not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.62no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Generation 12.5 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameDevastatorPonte Vecchio
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date23 May 2013 (12 years ago)10 January 2023 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38416384 ×4
Core clock speed533 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed720 MHz1600 MHz
Number of transistors1,303 million100,000 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt2400 Watt
Texture fill rate17.281,638 ×4
Floating-point processing power0.553 TFLOPS52.43 TFLOPS ×4
ROPs8no data
TMUs241024 ×4
Tensor Coresno data1024 ×4
Ray Tracing Coresno data128 ×4
L1 Cacheno data64 MB
L2 Cacheno data408 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceIGPPCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM2e
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared128 GB ×4
Memory bus widthSystem Shared8192 Bit ×4
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1565 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data3,205 GB/s ×4
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.6
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/AN/A
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 May 2013 10 January 2023
Chip lithography 32 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 2400 Watt

HD 8650G has 6757% lower power consumption.

Data Center GPU Max Subsystem, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8650G and Data Center GPU Max Subsystem. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8650G is a notebook graphics card while Data Center GPU Max Subsystem is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 102 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8650G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 133 votes

Rate Data Center GPU Max Subsystem on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8650G or Data Center GPU Max Subsystem, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.