Quadro4 750 XGL vs Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking882not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataKelvin (2001−2003)
GPU code nameno dataNV25 A2
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 August 2013 (12 years ago)19 February 2002 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768no data
Core clock speed720 / 775 MHz275 MHz
Number of transistorsno data63 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm150 nm
Texture fill rateno data2.200
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataAGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amountno data128 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 - 2000 MHz225 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data7.2 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX118.1
OpenGLno data1.3
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 August 2013 19 February 2002
Chip lithography 28 nm 150 nm

HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 435.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics and Quadro4 750 XGL. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics is a notebook graphics card while Quadro4 750 XGL is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics
Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics
NVIDIA Quadro4 750 XGL
Quadro4 750 XGL

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 21 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8650G HD 8670M Dual Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Quadro4 750 XGL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics or Quadro4 750 XGL, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.