ATI Radeon E2400 vs HD 8650D IGP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1495
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.37
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameScrapperRV610
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date28 December 2013 (11 years ago)28 June 2007 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38440
Core clock speed720 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed844 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,303 million180 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate20.262.400
Floating-point processing power0.6482 TFLOPS0.048 TFLOPS
ROPs84
TMUs244
L1 Cache64 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KB32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPMXM-II
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared128 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared700 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data11.2 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)10.0 (10_0)
Shader Model5.04.0
OpenGL4.43.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 December 2013 28 June 2007
Chip lithography 32 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 25 Watt

HD 8650D IGP has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.

ATI E2400, on the other hand, has 160% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8650D IGP and Radeon E2400. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8650D IGP is a desktop graphics card while Radeon E2400 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8650D IGP
Radeon HD 8650D IGP
ATI Radeon E2400
Radeon E2400

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 9 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8650D IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Radeon E2400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8650D IGP or Radeon E2400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.