Radeon 890M vs HD 8650D IGP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated312
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data100.00
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025)
GPU code nameScrapperStrix Point
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date28 December 2013 (11 years ago)15 July 2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3841024
Core clock speed720 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed844 MHz2900 MHz
Number of transistors1,303 million34,000 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate20.26185.6
Floating-point processing power0.6482 TFLOPS5.939 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs2464
Ray Tracing Coresno data16
L0 Cacheno data256 KB
L1 Cache64 KB256 KB
L2 Cache256 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x8
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.8
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 December 2013 15 July 2024
Chip lithography 32 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 15 Watt

Radeon 890M has an age advantage of 10 years, a 700% more advanced lithography process, and 333.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8650D IGP and Radeon 890M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8650D IGP is a desktop graphics card while Radeon 890M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8650D IGP
Radeon HD 8650D IGP
AMD Radeon 890M
Radeon 890M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 9 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8650D IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 256 votes

Rate Radeon 890M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8650D IGP or Radeon 890M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.