GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q vs Radeon HD 8650D IGP

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated498
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data9.60
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameScrapperGP107
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date28 December 2013 (11 years ago)3 January 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384640
Core clock speed720 MHz1190 MHz
Boost clock speed844 MHz1328 MHz
Number of transistors1,303 million3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate20.2653.12
Floating-point processing power0.6482 TFLOPS1.7 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs2440
L1 Cache64 KB240 KB
L2 Cache256 KB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1752 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data112.1 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.4
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 December 2013 3 January 2018
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 75 Watt

HD 8650D IGP has 15.4% lower power consumption.

GTX 1050 Max-Q, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8650D IGP and GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8650D IGP is a desktop graphics card while GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8650D IGP
Radeon HD 8650D IGP
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 9 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8650D IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 262 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8650D IGP or GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.