Radeon Vega 6 Mobile Efficient vs HD 8610G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1159not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTerascale 3 (2010−2013)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameRichlandRaven
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date23 May 2013 (12 years ago)23 April 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384384
Core clock speed533 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed626 MHz1011 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,940 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data24.26
Floating-point processing powerno data0.7764 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 May 2013 23 April 2018
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm

Vega 6 Mobile Efficient has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8610G and Radeon Vega 6 Mobile Efficient. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8610G
Radeon HD 8610G
AMD Radeon Vega 6 Mobile Efficient
Radeon Vega 6 Mobile Efficient

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.1 30 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8610G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 5 votes

Rate Radeon Vega 6 Mobile Efficient on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8610G or Radeon Vega 6 Mobile Efficient, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.