Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU vs Radeon HD 8610G

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking	1080	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Architecture	Terascale 3 (2010−2013)	no data
GPU code name	Richland	no data
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	23 May 2013 (11 years ago)	10 November 2020 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	16
Core clock speed	533 MHz	1296 MHz
Boost clock speed	626 MHz	no data
Manufacturing process technology	32 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	10 Watt

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size

medium sized

no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	no data	LPDDR5-6400
Shared memory	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX

11

no data

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	23 May 2013	10 November 2020
Chip lithography	32 nm	5 nm

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---