Radeon 630 vs HD 8610G IGP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated755
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data5.77
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameDevastatorPolaris 23
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date23 May 2013 (12 years ago)13 May 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384512
Core clock speed533 MHz1082 MHz
Boost clock speed626 MHz1218 MHz
Number of transistors1,303 million2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate15.0238.98
Floating-point processing power0.4808 TFLOPS1.247 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs2432
L1 Cacheno data128 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data112.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.06.4
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 May 2013 13 May 2019
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 50 Watt

HD 8610G IGP has 42.9% lower power consumption.

Radeon 630, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8610G IGP and Radeon 630. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8610G IGP
Radeon HD 8610G IGP
AMD Radeon 630
Radeon 630

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon HD 8610G IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 34 votes

Rate Radeon 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8610G IGP or Radeon 630, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.