Radeon RX 460 1024SP vs HD 8570D

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1153not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.17no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameDevastator LiteBaffin
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date10 July 2013 (12 years ago)17 January 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2561024
Core clock speed800 MHz1090 MHz
Boost clock speed868 MHz1200 MHz
Number of transistors1,303 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate13.8976.80
Floating-point processing power0.4444 TFLOPS2.458 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs1664
L1 Cacheno data256 KB
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x8
Lengthno data170 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data112.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.06.4
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 July 2013 17 January 2017
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 75 Watt

HD 8570D has 15.4% lower power consumption.

RX 460 1024SP, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8570D and Radeon RX 460 1024SP. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8570D
Radeon HD 8570D
AMD Radeon RX 460 1024SP
Radeon RX 460 1024SP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 105 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8570D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 794 votes

Rate Radeon RX 460 1024SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8570D or Radeon RX 460 1024SP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.