ATI Radeon 9700 PRO X4 vs HD 8570D

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1162not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.16no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Rage 8 (2002−2007)
GPU code nameDevastator LiteR300
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date10 July 2013 (12 years ago)1 July 2002 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256no data
Core clock speed800 MHz325 MHz
Boost clock speed868 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,303 million110 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Wattno data
Texture fill rate13.892.600 ×4
Floating-point processing power0.4444 TFLOPSno data
ROPs88 ×4
TMUs168 ×4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCI
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared128 MB ×4
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit ×4
Memory clock speedSystem Shared310 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data19.84 GB/s ×4
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DVI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)9.0 (9_0)
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.42.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 July 2013 1 July 2002
Chip lithography 32 nm 150 nm

HD 8570D has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 369% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8570D and Radeon 9700 PRO X4. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 116 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8570D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Radeon 9700 PRO X4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8570D or Radeon 9700 PRO X4, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.