GeForce2 MX PCI vs Radeon HD 8570D

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1162not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.16no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameDevastator LiteNV11 A2
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date10 July 2013 (12 years ago)28 June 2000 (25 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256no data
Core clock speed800 MHz175 MHz
Boost clock speed868 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,303 million20 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Wattno data
Texture fill rate13.890.7
Floating-point processing power0.4444 TFLOPSno data
ROPs82
TMUs164

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCI
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared32 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared32 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared166 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data664.0 MB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)7.0
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.41.2
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 July 2013 28 June 2000
Chip lithography 32 nm 180 nm

HD 8570D has an age advantage of 13 years, and a 463% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8570D and GeForce2 MX PCI. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 116 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8570D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 11 votes

Rate GeForce2 MX PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8570D or GeForce2 MX PCI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.