ATI Radeon 9200 SE PCI vs HD 8550G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1090not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.10no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameDevastator LiteRV280
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date23 May 2013 (11 years ago)1 March 2003 (21 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256no data
Core clock speed515 MHz200 MHz
Boost clock speed720 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,303 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate11.520.8
Floating-point processing power0.3686 TFLOPSno data
ROPs84
TMUs164

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceIGPPCI
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared64 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared166 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data2.656 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)8.1
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.41.4
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 May 2013 1 March 2003
Chip lithography 32 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 28 Watt

HD 8550G has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 368.8% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9200 SE PCI, on the other hand, has 25% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8550G and Radeon 9200 SE PCI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8550G is a notebook card while Radeon 9200 SE PCI is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8550G
Radeon HD 8550G
ATI Radeon 9200 SE PCI
Radeon 9200 SE PCI

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 97 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8550G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon 9200 SE PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.