GeForce GTX 650 Ti OEM vs Radeon HD 8550G

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1084not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.12no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameDevastator LiteGK106
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date23 May 2013 (11 years ago)31 March 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256768
Core clock speed515 MHz928 MHz
Boost clock speed720 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,303 million2,540 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt110 Watt
Texture fill rate11.5259.39
Floating-point processing power0.3686 TFLOPS1.425 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs1664

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data145 mm
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1350 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data86.4 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 May 2013 31 March 2013
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 110 Watt

HD 8550G has an age advantage of 1 month, and 214.3% lower power consumption.

GTX 650 Ti OEM, on the other hand, has a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8550G and GeForce GTX 650 Ti OEM. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8550G
Radeon HD 8550G
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti OEM
GeForce GTX 650 Ti OEM

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 97 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8550G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 23 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 650 Ti OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.