FirePro W4000 vs Radeon HD 8550G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1159not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.18no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameDevastator LitePitcairn
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date23 May 2013 (12 years ago)7 August 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256768
Core clock speed515 MHz825 MHz
Boost clock speed720 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,303 million2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate11.5239.60
Floating-point processing power0.3686 TFLOPS1.267 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs1648
L1 Cacheno data192 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data183 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared800 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data102.4 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 May 2013 7 August 2012
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 75 Watt

HD 8550G has an age advantage of 9 months, and 114% lower power consumption.

FirePro W4000, on the other hand, has a 14% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8550G and FirePro W4000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8550G is a notebook graphics card while FirePro W4000 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 104 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8550G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FirePro W4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8550G or FirePro W4000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.