FirePro A320 vs Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking954not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)
GPU code nameno dataTrinity GL
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 August 2013 (12 years ago)6 June 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640384
Core clock speed720 / 975 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speedno data955 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,303 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data100 Watt
Texture fill rateno data22.92
Floating-point processing powerno data0.7334 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed2000 MHzSystem Shared
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1111.2 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.0
OpenGLno data4.4
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 August 2013 6 June 2012
Chip lithography 28 nm 32 nm

HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics and FirePro A320. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics is a notebook graphics card while FirePro A320 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics
Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics
AMD FirePro A320
FirePro A320

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 24 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8550G HD 8670M Dual Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate FirePro A320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics or FirePro A320, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.