Radeon Instinct MI250 vs HD 8550 OEM

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)CDNA 2.0 (2021)
GPU code nameTurksAldebaran
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date25 October 2013 (11 years ago)8 November 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48013312
Core clock speed650 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1700 MHz
Number of transistors716 million58,200 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt500 Watt
Texture fill rate15.601,414
Floating-point processing power0.624 TFLOPS45.26 TFLOPS
ROPs8no data
TMUs24832

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount1 GB128 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit8192 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s3,277 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGANo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)N/A
Shader Model5.0N/A
OpenGL4.4N/A
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 October 2013 8 November 2021
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 128 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 500 Watt

HD 8550 OEM has 733.3% lower power consumption.

Instinct MI250, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 566.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8550 OEM and Radeon Instinct MI250. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8550 OEM is a desktop card while Radeon Instinct MI250 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8550 OEM
Radeon HD 8550 OEM
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250
Radeon Instinct MI250

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 4 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8550 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 18 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.