Tesla X2090 vs Radeon HD 8530M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameMarsGF110
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date10 January 2014 (11 years ago)25 July 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320512
Core clock speed650 MHz651 MHz
Boost clock speed700 MHzno data
Number of transistors950 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data225 Watt
Texture fill rate11.2041.66
Floating-point processing power0.448 TFLOPS1.332 TFLOPS
ROPs848
TMUs1664
L1 Cache96 KB1 MB
L2 Cache128 KB768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
Widthno dataMXM Module

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB6 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz924 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s177.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-2.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 January 2014 25 July 2011
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm

HD 8530M has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

Tesla X2090, on the other hand, has a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8530M and Tesla X2090. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8530M is a notebook graphics card while Tesla X2090 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8530M
Radeon HD 8530M
NVIDIA Tesla X2090
Tesla X2090

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 9 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8530M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 14 votes

Rate Tesla X2090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8530M or Tesla X2090, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.