Quadro FX Go540 vs Radeon HD 8510G

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1122not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.85no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameDevastatorNV43
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date23 May 2013 (11 years ago)9 August 2004 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speed554 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed720 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,303 million146 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate17.282.400
Floating-point processing power0.553 TFLOPSno data
ROPs84
TMUs248

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPMXM-II
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared128 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared225 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data7.2 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model5.03.0
OpenGL4.42.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 May 2013 9 August 2004
Chip lithography 32 nm 110 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 25 Watt

HD 8510G has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 243.8% more advanced lithography process.

FX Go540, on the other hand, has 40% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8510G and Quadro FX Go540. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8510G is a notebook graphics card while Quadro FX Go540 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8510G
Radeon HD 8510G
NVIDIA Quadro FX Go540
Quadro FX Go540

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 28 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8510G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX Go540 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.