FirePro S9150 vs Radeon HD 8470D

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1187not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.05no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameScrapperHawaii
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date29 July 2013 (12 years ago)7 August 2014 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1922816
Core clock speed800 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed850 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,303 million6,200 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt235 Watt
Texture fill rate10.20158.4
Floating-point processing power0.3264 TFLOPS5.069 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs12176
L1 Cacheno data704 KB
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Form factorno datafull height / full length
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared512 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data320 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.06.3
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 July 2013 7 August 2014
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 235 Watt

HD 8470D has 262% lower power consumption.

FirePro S9150, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 14% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8470D and FirePro S9150. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8470D is a desktop graphics card while FirePro S9150 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 125 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8470D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 13 votes

Rate FirePro S9150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8470D or FirePro S9150, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.