FirePro S7100X vs Radeon HD 8450G

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1203not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.76no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameScrapperAmethyst
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date23 May 2013 (12 years ago)25 May 2016 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1922048
Core clock speed533 MHz725 MHz
Boost clock speed720 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,303 million5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate8.64092.80
Floating-point processing power0.2765 TFLOPS2.97 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs12128
L1 Cacheno data512 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data160.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.06.3
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 May 2013 25 May 2016
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 100 Watt

HD 8450G has 186% lower power consumption.

S7100X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 14% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8450G and FirePro S7100X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8450G is a notebook graphics card while FirePro S7100X is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 18 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8450G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 10 votes

Rate FirePro S7100X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8450G or FirePro S7100X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.