HD Graphics P4700 vs Radeon HD 8410G

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1139not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.28no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Generation 7.5 (2013)
GPU code nameScrapperHaswell GT2
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date23 May 2013 (12 years ago)1 June 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192160
Core clock speed600 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed720 MHz1300 MHz
Number of transistors1,303 million392 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt86 Watt
Texture fill rate8.64026.00
Floating-point processing power0.2765 TFLOPS0.416 TFLOPS
ROPs42
TMUs1220

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPIGP
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.44.3
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/A1.1.80

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 32 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 86 Watt

HD 8410G has 145.7% lower power consumption.

HD Graphics P4700, on the other hand, has a 45.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8410G and HD Graphics P4700. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8410G is a notebook graphics card while HD Graphics P4700 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8410G
Radeon HD 8410G
Intel HD Graphics P4700
HD Graphics P4700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon HD 8410G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 19 votes

Rate HD Graphics P4700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8410G or HD Graphics P4700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.