ATI Radeon HD 4730 vs HD 8400E

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1233not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.03no data
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameKalindiRV770
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date23 April 2013 (12 years ago)8 June 2009 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$79

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128640
Core clock speed600 MHz750 MHz
Number of transistors1,178 million956 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt110 Watt
Texture fill rate4.80024.00
Floating-point processing power0.1536 TFLOPS0.96 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs832
L1 Cacheno data128 KB
L2 Cacheno data128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared512 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared900 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data57.6 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.34.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 April 2013 8 June 2009
Chip lithography 28 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 110 Watt

HD 8400E has an age advantage of 3 years, a 96.4% more advanced lithography process, and 340% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8400E and Radeon HD 4730. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8400E is a notebook graphics card while Radeon HD 4730 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8400E
Radeon HD 8400E
ATI Radeon HD 4730
Radeon HD 4730

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 9 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8400E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 27 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4730 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8400E or Radeon HD 4730, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.