Quadro FX 4400G vs Radeon HD 8400E

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1221not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.01no data
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameKalindiNV45
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date23 April 2013 (12 years ago)28 July 2005 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,999

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128no data
Core clock speed600 MHz375 MHz
Number of transistors1,178 million222 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt83 Watt
Texture fill rate4.8004.500
Floating-point processing power0.1536 TFLOPSno data
ROPs412
TMUs812

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared512 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared525 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data33.6 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.33.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 April 2013 28 July 2005
Chip lithography 28 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 83 Watt

HD 8400E has an age advantage of 7 years, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 232% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8400E and Quadro FX 4400G. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8400E is a notebook graphics card while Quadro FX 4400G is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8400E
Radeon HD 8400E
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4400G
Quadro FX 4400G

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 9 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8400E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX 4400G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8400E or Quadro FX 4400G, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.