GeForce4 488 Go vs Radeon HD 8400E

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1244not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.03no data
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameKalindiNV18 A4
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date23 April 2013 (12 years ago)1 March 2002 (24 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1282
Core clock speed600 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data275 MHz
Number of transistors1,178 million29 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Wattno data
Texture fill rate4.8001.200
Floating-point processing power0.1536 TFLOPSno data
ROPs42
TMUs84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPAGP 8x

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared64 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared275 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data8.8 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)8.0
Shader Model6.3no data
OpenGL4.61.3
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 April 2013 1 March 2002
Chip lithography 28 nm 150 nm

HD 8400E has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 436% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8400E and GeForce4 488 Go. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 9 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8400E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate GeForce4 488 Go on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8400E or GeForce4 488 Go, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.