GMA 500 vs Radeon HD 8400E

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1173not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)PowerVR SGX535 (2008−2010)
GPU code nameKalindiPoulsbo
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date23 April 2013 (11 years ago)2 March 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12832
Core clock speed600 MHz200 MHz
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Wattno data
Texture fill rate4.8000.8
Floating-point processing power0.1536 gflops0.0128 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 1.0 x16
WidthIGPIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)10.1
Shader Model6.34.1
OpenGL4.6ES 2.0
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 April 2013 2 March 2008
Chip lithography 28 nm 130 nm

HD 8400E has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8400E and GMA 500. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8400E
Radeon HD 8400E
Intel GMA 500
GMA 500

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.4 7 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8400E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 15 votes

Rate GMA 500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.